Image
Icon

Directory

IconAccounting & Tax
IconAccreditation Bodies
IconActuaries
IconAssociations and Institutes
IconAuditors
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconBusiness Process Management
IconBusiness Process Outsourcing
IconCompany Secretarial Services
IconCompare Medical Scheme Benefits
IconCompliance
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDebit Order Collection Facilities
IconEducation and Training
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconExpatriate Cover
IconFAIS
IconHealthcare Consultants
IconHuman Resources
IconInformation Technology and Software Partners
IconLegal
IconManaged Healthcare Service Providers
IconMedical Aid Administrators
IconMedical Aid Schemes
IconMedical Schemes Trustees Liability Insurance
IconMedical Service Providers
IconOmbud
IconPolicy Administration
IconPublications
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconSurveys & Research
IconTraining Courses & Workshops
IconWellness Programs
Image
  Subscribe To »

The once-and-for-all rule for delictual damages

Published

2017

Tue

11

Apr

 

 

 

 

Patrick Bracher, Director
Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.

 

 

 

A person who claims for damages sustained as a result of injuries negligently caused by someone else has a single, indivisible cause of action and must sue for all damages in one claim.

This proposition was reasserted in the context of a prescription allegation regarding a Road Accident Fund Act claim.

The RAF Act only allows an injured person to claim general damages if it is certified to be a serious injury by a medical practitioner.

The claimant in Manukha v Road Accident Fund pursued a claim for medical expenses and other actual losses but only delivered the form certifying her injuries as serious in order to claim non-pecuniary damages more than three years after the event.

The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed an allegation that the general damages claim had been extinguished by prescription. The claim for damages had been lodged in time even if the general damages had only been pursued later.

The once-and-for-all rule prevents paying future loss of earnings and medical expenses by future payments when the losses accrue, and needs to be looked at by the legislature in that context.

 
Source: Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

Debarment and Treating Customers Fairly

The necessity for a process to ensure that those who fall foul of the fit and proper requirements are not allowed to practice was never in question. Unfortunately, the application and execution of the debarment ...
Read More »

  

New findings contradict NHI White Paper

Recent research conducted by Econex, a leading firm in competition economics, paints a different picture to that portrayed in the NHI White Paper on healthcare in South Africa. In a research note published this ...
Read More »

  

Why I love FAIS

By Tamara Jacobsen: Director- Applied Learning Academy The provisions of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 2002 (FAIS) have been in place for more than a decade now. Financial advisors, ...
Read More »

  

The reality of medical aid late-joiner penalties

The law clearly states that late-joiners to medical schemes may be penalised, depending on proof of previous South African medical aid membership. Anyone who is 35 years or older will be eligible to pay a late-joiner ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Image

Short-term »

Advertise Here
Image
Image
Image
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Joint Life & Survivor Policy:

A policy arranged on two or more lives where the benefits are paid on the death of the last survivor.  .
More Definitions »

 
 
By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2017.
All Rights Reserved.
Icon

Advertise

  Icon

eZine

  Icon

Contact IG

Icon

Media Pack

  Icon

RSS Feeds