Image
Icon

Directory

IconActuaries
IconAssociations & Institutes
IconAuditors
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconBusiness Chambers
IconBusiness Process Management
IconBusiness Process Outsourcing
IconCall Centre Outsourcing & Sales
IconCompliance
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDebit Order Collection Facilities
IconEducation and Training
IconFAIS
IconHuman Resources
IconInformation Technology and Software Partners
IconLegal
IconLife Insurance Companies
IconLife Insurance Products
IconOmbud
IconOutbound Sales
IconPolicy Administration
IconPolicy Trading
IconPublications
IconRe-insurance Companies
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconSales and Sales Management
IconSocial Grants (Government)
IconSurveys and Research
IconTraining Courses & Workshops
IconWellness Programs
Image
  Subscribe To »

Financial Soundness – at all times

Published

2017

Mon

20

Mar

 

By Alan Holton

At a recent meeting between senior officials of the FAIS Division of the FSB and a committee of industry members, Ms Lorraine van Deventer expressed the concern that many FSPs still do not fully appreciate the financial soundness requirements that were imposed in the Fit and Proper Requirements contained in Board Notice 106 of 2008.

In terms of S 9 of this Board Notice, the assets of every FSP must exceed such FSPs liabilities. The problem arises in that the specific requirement expressly excludes certain assets and certain liabilities from the calculation.

In calculating the effect of this requirement, all goodwill, intangible assets, investments in and loans to related parties and investments with, or loans to, persons to whom the FSP renders financial services, must be excluded from the total assets. Liabilities may be reduced by excluding any loans due by the FSP but have been subordinated in favour of other creditors.

Accountants who are required to certify the solvency of an entity often are not aware of these particular exclusions and hence do not take the exclusions into account. And so, as happens fairly frequently, accountants of FSPs who are unaware of these specific requirements, provide their clients with technically incorrect confirmation concerning their financial soundness as required by Board Notice 106 of 2008.

There is another requirement regarding financial soundness that is also often overlooked.

Any Category I FSP that holds client assets or receive premiums or money and every Category II and Category IV FSP must comply with these requirements at all times. This specific requirement has not expressly been imposed on Category I FSP who do not hold client assets or receive premiums or money. The implications are that FSPs that fall within this definition must have procedures in place to ensure that these requirements are met at all times.

All FSPs are, in terms of s 19 (1)(a) of the FAIS Act, 2002 required to maintain full and proper accounting records on a continual basis, brought up to date monthly. It would seem appropriate therefore, for Category I FSP that holds client assets or receive premiums or money and all Category II and Category IV FSP’s to actually record in writing their calculations, based on the monthly accounts, proving their ongoing compliance with this requirement.

These particular FSPs are also required to hold liquid assets equal to varying percentages of annual expenditure. Again, when recording compliance with this requirement, it was recommended by the FAIS officials that the type and nature of the liquid assets held by the FSP be recorded so as to be able to demonstrate at all times that this requirement had been met. In this regard, special attention must be given to the definition of “liquid assets” in Board Notice 106 of 2008.

Once the proposed Revised Fit and Proper Requirements are finalised and
Board Notice 106 of 2008 repealed, these requirements will still apply. There will however be additional requirements that have to be met and these new requirements will be dealt with once the revised Fit and Proper Requirements have become effective.

Alan Holton is a director of Compliance Monitoring Systems cc and an associate of Moonstone Compliance.

 
Source: Paul Kruger: Moonstone Compliance (Pty) Ltd
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

Insurance Bill Update June 2017

The National Treasury presented its response to public comments received on the Insurance Bill, 2016, to Parliament’s Standing Committee on Finance in May. A copy of the Bill, as well as the presentation ...
Read More »

  

FSB fines Smart Life R150 000 for Long-term Insurance Act Contravention

The Registrar of Long-term Insurance (the Registrar) referred a case against The Smart Life Insurance Company Limited (Smart Life) to the Enforcement Committee of the Financial Services Board. During ...
Read More »

  

Partnering to increase the number of accredited financial planners and advisors

Johannesburg: The Financial Planning Institute of Southern Africa (FPI), a South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) recognised professional body and a SARS approved Recognised Controlling Body, is proud ...
Read More »

  

Technology alone will not determine success of banking and insurance providers in the digital future

Digital technology is reshaping the banking and insurance sectors at an unprecedented rate. Basic transactions in traditional banking continue to migrate from physical to digital channels and banks downsize their ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Healthcare »

Image

Investment »

Image

Retirement »

Image

Short-term »

Advertise Here
Image
Image
Image
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Insurable Risk:

A risk that can be insured in terms of an insurer’s underwriting standards.
More Definitions »

 
 
By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2017.
All Rights Reserved.
Icon

Advertise

  Icon

eZine

  Icon

Contact IG

Icon

Media Pack

  Icon

RSS Feeds