IconAppraisers and Valuers
IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDefensive Driver Training
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconInsurance Brokers - Alphabetical Listing
IconInsurance Brokers by Type of Product or Service Needed
IconInsurance Companies
IconInsurance Consultants
IconLightning Damage & Surge Protection Specialists
IconOnline Quotes and Cover
IconPremium Financing
IconPublic Loss Adjustors
IconRating Agencies
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconRisk Finance
IconRisk Management
IconRisk Surveyors
IconSalvage Operators
IconTelephone Quotes
IconVehicle Accident Management
IconVehicle and Household Risk Inspection Services
IconVehicle Tracking
IconWellness Programs
  Subscribe To »

Risks of unlawful social media content







Changes in UK defamation landscape and what you need to know

By Joanna Conway (UK)
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP

A carefully curated social media presence is a critical business requirement, but there are risks. One of these risks is unlawful content – be that unlawful content posted to your businesses’ own social media account (exposing the company to potential liability) or harmful content about your business (or its C-Suite or key personnel) posted on independent sites.

So how do you tackle unlawful content? Often the first point of call is the law of defamation. The UK is renowned as a claimant friendly jurisdiction for defamation litigation. With its widely respected court system and judiciary, the UK has been the forum of choice for international defamation disputes. Note that the rules have recently been tightened up with stricter thresholds brought in for defamation actions and a requirement, aimed at stopping “libel tourism,” that for claims against non-EU defendants the UK must be the “most appropriate place” in which to litigate (the Defamation Act 2013).

This tightening up of UK defamation law has driven creative litigation, with the developing areas of privacy and data protection law, as well as the sometimes overlooked claim of malicious falsehood, providing fertile ground.

In the wake of the UK press phone-hacking scandal, victims of hacking brought a civil case for invasion of privacy. This case, Gulati & Ors v MGN Limited [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch) (21 May 2015), confirmed that damages are available for the invasion of privacy per se and for distress (without the need for consequential use of the information). The total measure of damages was substantial and this result, together with the tightening up on the rules of defamation, has driven claimants to frame unlawful content claims as privacy claims.

Similarly, in the case of Vidal-Hall v Google, [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015), the UK courts held that damages for breach of data protection laws were available to compensate for distress, even if there was no financial loss caused. This holding opens up the possibility of data protection claims being run instead of, or alongside, a defamation action.

As a company, if it is your business rather than your personnel that is the subject of the unlawful content then the corporate entity may be able to bring a defamation action in the UK if it meets all the necessary requirements. The new threshold test requires the company to show that the content caused or is likely to cause “serious financial harm.” This requirement has led to a renewed focus on the action of malicious falsehood, which applies where a publication is untrue and made with “malice” (which includes recklessly), but avoids the “serious financial harm” test and some of the new stricter rules now applicable to defamation actions.

Taking a step back, what all of this means is that where unlawful content about an individual is posted (whether on your business’ own social media accounts or about your personnel on an independent platform), you need to be aware that there are enhanced and developing means for the individual to seek redress. The boundaries of these claims are not yet clear and so it is advisable to have measures in place to ensure that these issues are appropriately handled. We expect to see further developments in this area. Indeed, the possibility of running a data protection claim in tandem with a defamation claim has very recently been approved by the UK Court of Appeal. (HH Prince Moulay Hicham Ben Abdallah Al Alaoui of Morocco v Elaph Publishing Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 29 (27 January 2017).)

Similarly, where the unlawful content relates to the company, you should consider that even if a defamation action may not be viable, the claim for malicious falsehood could be. As stated above, these areas are developing and it remains to be seen where the boundaries ultimately will fall. As a result, the UK courts currently remain an attractive venue for claims concerning harm to reputation.

Source: Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
« Back to previous page Print this page » |

Breaking News »

Road fatalities during the holiday period

Following the recent announcement by Transport Minister Joe Maswanganyi that there was a 51% increase in road fatalities from 156 road fatalities during the 2016 Easter holidays to 235 road fatalities during the ...
Read More »


FNB Islamic Banking launches Takaful

Johannesburg: Today FNB Islamic Banking launched Takaful – simply defined, it is an innovative solution which is a co-operative system of reimbursement in the case of loss, which is organised as an Islamic ...
Read More »


One more holiday break in sight – stay safe on the roads

While many may have pleasant memories of the Easter weekend, others are however counting the costs of loss over the long weekend due to various road accidents that happened across the country. According to traffic ...
Read More »


Happy campers make for happy holidays

The great outdoors is a favourite South African pastime, whether it is ‘trekking’ a caravan to a remote beach location, camping in a tent in the bush, or sitting around the campfire under the stars ...
Read More »


More News »


Healthcare »


Investment »


Life »


Retirement »

Advertise Here

From The Glossary »



An option is a contract between two parties, where the one party sells the other an option to either buy or sell a given asset on specified terms. Options can be traded.
More Definitions »

By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2017.
All Rights Reserved.





Contact IG


Media Pack


RSS Feeds