Image
Icon

Directory

IconAppraisers and Valuers
IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDefensive Driver Training
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconInsurance Brokers - Alphabetical Listing
IconInsurance Brokers by Type of Product or Service Needed
IconInsurance Companies
IconInsurance Consultants
IconLightning Damage & Surge Protection Specialists
IconOmbud
IconOnline Quotes and Cover
IconPremium Financing
IconPublic Loss Adjustors
IconPublications
IconRating Agencies
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconRisk Finance
IconRisk Management
IconRisk Surveyors
IconSalvage Operators
IconTelephone Quotes
IconVehicle Accident Management
IconVehicle and Household Risk Inspection Services
IconVehicle Tracking
IconWellness Programs
Image
  Subscribe To »

Cyberattack by telephone held not to be computer fraud (US)

Published

2017

Wed

29

Mar

 

 

 

 

 

Patrick Bracher, Director
Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.

 

 

Where an insurer’s policy covered computer fraud, a Georgia US judge refused to grant the insured an indemnity when the fraud had been committed over the phone.

The insured provides a service that allows customers to load funds onto debit cards issued by third party banks and sold by retailers. The amount on the card can be redeemed by telephoning the insured which then transfers the funds to the issuing bank for the cardholder to draw on.

A coding error allowed cardholders to redeem the cards more than once and the insured lost more than $11.4 million in unauthorised charges. The court held that the policy did not cover the losses incurred from unauthorised redemption of the debit cards because the redemptions made over the phone were not made by computer even though the transactions were processed by computer at the insured’s end.

That a computer was somehow involved in the loss did not establish that the wrongdoers ‘used’ a computer to cause the loss as required by the policy.

[The case is InComm Holdings Inc. v Great American Insurance Co. case number 1:15-cv-2671 US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia]

 
Source: Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

Road fatalities during the holiday period

Following the recent announcement by Transport Minister Joe Maswanganyi that there was a 51% increase in road fatalities from 156 road fatalities during the 2016 Easter holidays to 235 road fatalities during the ...
Read More »

  

FNB Islamic Banking launches Takaful

Johannesburg: Today FNB Islamic Banking launched Takaful – simply defined, it is an innovative solution which is a co-operative system of reimbursement in the case of loss, which is organised as an Islamic ...
Read More »

  

One more holiday break in sight – stay safe on the roads

While many may have pleasant memories of the Easter weekend, others are however counting the costs of loss over the long weekend due to various road accidents that happened across the country. According to traffic ...
Read More »

  

Happy campers make for happy holidays

The great outdoors is a favourite South African pastime, whether it is ‘trekking’ a caravan to a remote beach location, camping in a tent in the bush, or sitting around the campfire under the stars ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Healthcare »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Income Reinvestment:

Adding a dividend to the existing capital sum instead of taking a cash payment.
More Definitions »

 
 
By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2017.
All Rights Reserved.
Icon

Advertise

  Icon

eZine

  Icon

Contact IG

Icon

Media Pack

  Icon

RSS Feeds