Image
Icon

Directory

IconAppraisers and Valuers
IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDefensive Driver Training
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconInsurance Brokers - Alphabetical Listing
IconInsurance Brokers by Type of Product or Service Needed
IconInsurance Companies
IconInsurance Consultants
IconLightning Damage & Surge Protection Specialists
IconOmbud
IconOnline Quotes and Cover
IconPremium Financing
IconPublic Loss Adjustors
IconPublications
IconRating Agencies
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconRisk Finance
IconRisk Management
IconRisk Surveyors
IconSalvage Operators
IconTelephone Quotes
IconVehicle Accident Management
IconVehicle and Household Risk Inspection Services
IconVehicle Tracking
IconWellness Programs
Image
  Subscribe To »

Cyberattack by telephone held not to be computer fraud (US)

Published

2017

Wed

29

Mar

 

 

 

 

 

Patrick Bracher, Director
Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.

 

 

Where an insurer’s policy covered computer fraud, a Georgia US judge refused to grant the insured an indemnity when the fraud had been committed over the phone.

The insured provides a service that allows customers to load funds onto debit cards issued by third party banks and sold by retailers. The amount on the card can be redeemed by telephoning the insured which then transfers the funds to the issuing bank for the cardholder to draw on.

A coding error allowed cardholders to redeem the cards more than once and the insured lost more than $11.4 million in unauthorised charges. The court held that the policy did not cover the losses incurred from unauthorised redemption of the debit cards because the redemptions made over the phone were not made by computer even though the transactions were processed by computer at the insured’s end.

That a computer was somehow involved in the loss did not establish that the wrongdoers ‘used’ a computer to cause the loss as required by the policy.

[The case is InComm Holdings Inc. v Great American Insurance Co. case number 1:15-cv-2671 US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia]

 
Source: Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

The most innovative, streamlined way of doing business and personal insurance

In the same way that Uber and Airbnb have revolutionised their respective industries, so has Infiniti Online transformed insurance. We are a company born out of innovation, always prepared to take calculated risks ...
Read More »

  

Three steps to choosing the right insurance adviser

With the recent hard-hitting winter weather, along with fires in the Western Cape, and cold temperatures creeping in around the country as winter fully sets in, having adequate insurance cover is essential. Insuring ...
Read More »

  

CAMARGUE CYBER ATTACK PLUS (“CCAP”) CYBER RISK SOLUTION

      By Camargue Underwriting Managers (Pty) Ltd           The incredible pace of growth in the global technology space has produced ...
Read More »

  

Turkish economy surges in Q1 2017, driven by Exports

By Coface, the international trade credit insurance company                                         Chart: ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Healthcare »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Real GDP:

Inflation-adjusted measure of Gross Domestic Product.
More Definitions »

 
 
By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2017.
All Rights Reserved.
Icon

Advertise

  Icon

eZine

  Icon

Contact IG

Icon

Media Pack

  Icon

RSS Feeds