Image
Icon

Directory

IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconCompare Medical Scheme Benefits
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconExpatriate Cover
IconHealthcare Consultants
IconMedical Aid Brokers
IconMedical Aid Schemes
IconMedical Schemes Trustees Liability Insurance
IconMedical Service Providers
IconOmbud
IconOnline Quotes
IconPublications
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconWellness Programs
Image
  Subscribe To »

Yay or Nay to Demarcation Regulations?

Published

2017

Thu

20

Apr

By Marcel du Toit, CEO Optivest Health Solutions

The demarcation between health insurance and medical schemes has a long history, going back as far as 2000 after the enactment of the Medical Schemes Act no. 131 of 1998.

The basis of the demarcation debate was the fact that certain health insurance products were deemed to infringe on and compete unfairly with medical schemes, without being subject to the same regulatory requirements.

This culminated into various versions of draft regulations for health insurance products to ensure a clearer role of each product while remaining competitive and educating consumers on the complementary role of such products in their health portfolio.

The final Demarcation Regulations (DR) was signed into law on 23 December 2016, with all new policies having to comply from 1 April 2017. Existing policies have to comply after 1 January 2018.

What about Gap Cover?

As far as Gap Cover, as a Short-term Health Insurance product goes, the new regulations confirmed that this product is still necessary and will remain, albeit with a few changes.

The ever increasing cost of services provided by medical professionals, along with the fact that the cost of such services are to date unregulated, caused medical scheme members to experience an increasing “self-payment” shortfall of medical expenses. These out-of-pocket costs occur as medical schemes implement more and more restrictive practices such as doctors’ networks and managed care to ensure containment of benefits paid for services delivered. A Gap Cover policy addresses the resultant shortfalls.

The increased use of co-payments, charged by medical schemes as a condition for payment/delivery of pre-determined services to members, has further increased the burden of personal expenses of members. These co-payments can be insured via a Co-payment benefit, allowing for cover of an insured event at a defined cost.

What are the changes affecting Gap Cover policies?

The three most significant changes brought about by the new demarcation regulations are:

  1. Maximum Benefit Capped
    The capping of the aggregated benefit at R150 000 per beneficiary per annum should not be deemed as restrictive at all, especially given the historical claims for Gap Cover products in the market. The defined benefit is in fact in the interest of the member, and more specifically aimed at “containing” excessive charges by medical professionals for services rendered.

    The “per beneficiary” approach vs a “per policy” approach furthermore aligns much better with the known benefit structure and practices of medical schemes. Collective benefits of a four member family are therefore more realistic and practical than previously quoted “uncapped” benefit levels by some providers in the market.

    Capping the annual benefit level at R150 000 furthermore equalises the playing field for Gap Cover providers in the interest of the consumer. Price and access becomes a key differentiator.
  2. No discrimination based on age
    In line with the requirement that medical schemes were obliged not to discriminate on the basis of age, Gap Cover policies now also have to subscribe to open enrolment for all age groups to support the objective of social solidarity.
  3. Underwriting Gap Cover contracts as group
    Another Demarcation Regulation change is differentiated pricing on a “per group” basis, which allow for open enrolment and avoids anti-selective practices in the market.

Underwriting Gap Cover contracts for Groups

No provider of Gap Cover can decline an applicant, irrespective of age, BUT is allowed to charge a higher premium for new applicants above a certain age. The regulations allow for differentiated pricing i.e. a more expensive premium for the same benefits based on the age of an applicant. The condition for the above is that it applies to all applicants over a specific age and NOT any one individual.

Prescribed Minimum Benefits

A burning issue for complementary health cover products have always been the implications of covering PMBs (prescribed minimum benefits). With the new regulations, Gap Cover insurers will only cover the difference between total costs of a relevant health service and the amount a person’s medical scheme has paid. The intent of the regulations is clearly to ensure PMBs are covered by Medical Schemes and not by Gap Cover products.

In addition to this, costs or expenses that are not covered by a medical scheme may not be covered by health insurance policies.

In summary, Optivest supports the above changes in the regulations and see more opportunity for relevant health advice to members of medical schemes in the market.

Member education and relevant advice on their health portfolio becomes ever more important in the financial planning process.

For more information visit
www.optivest.co.za.

 
Source: Paul Kruger: Moonstone Compliance (Pty) Ltd
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

SA to save billions on HIV treatment

South Africa has found a breakthrough pricing agreement that will speed up the availability of the first affordable, generic and single-pill HIV treatment programme. Health Minister, Dr Aaron Motsoaledi, has collaborated ...
Read More »

  

Parents urged to vaccinate children

Health Minister, Dr Aaron Motsoaledi, has warned that his department may not achieve its set targets if anti-vaccine lobby groups continue to mislead parents about the efficacy of immunisation. This follows protests ...
Read More »

  

Taking on the high cost of healthcare

Growing collaboration between leading medical aid schemes and day hospitals is good news for consumers. By Bibi Ross-Goss, group operational manager, Advanced Health   Medical aid premiums ...
Read More »

  

Could hidden factors be driving absenteeism at your company?

Integrated absenteeism management solution identifies barriers to productivity   When a company experiences a spike in absenteeism, there could be any number of underlying causes ranging from an influenza ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Image

Short-term »

Advertise Here
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Risk:

The hazard exposure, or chance of loss. The term ‘risk’ is used also in a general way to designate the subject matter of an insurance policy. It may also be used as a generic term for the insured. The risk that is transferredfrom the insured to the insurer under an insurance policy can consist of: _ underwriting risk – the uncertainty as to whether or not the loss event will occur and/or the ultimate amount of any claim payment in respect of ...
More Definitions »

 
 
By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2017.
All Rights Reserved.
Icon

Advertise

  Icon

eZine

  Icon

Contact IG

Icon

Media Pack

  Icon

RSS Feeds