Image
Icon

Directory

IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconCompare Medical Scheme Benefits
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconExpatriate Cover
IconHealthcare Consultants
IconMedical Aid Brokers
IconMedical Aid Schemes
IconMedical Schemes Trustees Liability Insurance
IconMedical Service Providers
IconOmbud
IconOnline Quotes
IconPublications
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconWellness Programs
Image
  Subscribe To »

New findings contradict NHI White Paper

Published

2017

Wed

26

Jul

 

Recent research conducted by Econex, a leading firm in competition economics, paints a different picture to that portrayed in the NHI White Paper on healthcare in South Africa.

In a research note published this month, it challenges the claim that the current financing system punishes the poor.

A summary of the research, published as a blog post, positions its research:

“A central issue in driving universal cover under a National Health Insurance (NHI) system is the redistribution of resources to the poor, whose need for healthcare generally exceeds the resources allocated. This is an important issue, as it is recognised that healthcare resources need to be distributed in an equitable manner. However, the South African debate has been polarised on this issue with claims that the South Africa has a “financing system that punishes the poor” (stated in both the 2015 and 2017 versions of the NHI White Paper).”

“In order to contribute to the ongoing debate and in the light of renewed focus on the implementation of (NHI) in South Africa by 2025/2026, Econex has updated the research on the socioeconomic distribution of healthcare benefit and healthcare financing, This research has been commissioned by Mediclinic South Africa. In updating the research on this issue we have relied on household survey data, information from the Council for Medical Schemes, as well as estimates from National Treasury.”

“We find that financing incidence is in fact pro-poor in the sense that the wealthiest 40% of the population contributes the largest share. The poorest 60% of the population receives a higher proportion of benefits than what they pay for – a distribution that is in line with principles of equity and social solidarity. However, it must be noted that this poorer part of the population receives fewer benefits than those received by the wealthier 40% of the population. Importantly, the poor receive a smaller proportion of total healthcare benefits than what their share of healthcare need warrants. This is problematic.”

The more comprehensive (9 page) Econex research Note 45 can be
downloaded here.

 
Source: Paul Kruger: Moonstone Compliance (Pty) Ltd
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

So, you are thinking of having that baby…

By Marlise Kotze, Financial Planner at Alexander Forbes Retail I just came back from maternity leave with my second child in January. I know most people will warn you about the sleepless nights, vomits ...
Read More »

  

Understanding supplementary medical services

By Cape Medical Plan Supplementary services, like any medical service you receive, are often subject to an authorisation process. Although this might seem frustrating, it is implemented to protect both your ...
Read More »

  

Dialogue, HIV testing campaign targets men, boys

Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa will on Thursday participate in the launch of the Religious Leaders’ Dialogue Series and HIV Testing Services Campaign in Soshanguve, north of Pretoria. The Deputy President ...
Read More »

  

BHF announces new Managing Director

          Dr Katlego Mothudi, Managing Director Board of Healthcare Funders of Southern Africa                   The ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Image

Short-term »

Advertise Here
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Endorsement:

Documentary evidence of a change to an existing policy, for example, change of address, increase in sum insured, etc. An endorsement may result in an additional premium, a return premium or no premium adjustment.
More Definitions »

 
 
By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2017.
All Rights Reserved.
Icon

Advertise

  Icon

eZine

  Icon

Contact IG

Icon

Media Pack

  Icon

RSS Feeds