Image
Icon

Directory

IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconCompare Medical Scheme Benefits
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconExpatriate Cover
IconHealthcare Consultants
IconMedical Aid Brokers
IconMedical Aid Schemes
IconMedical Schemes Trustees Liability Insurance
IconMedical Service Providers
IconOmbud
IconOnline Quotes
IconPublications
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconWellness Programs
Image
  Subscribe To »

Can your doctor justify his fee?

Published

2017

Tue

01

Aug

What is reasonable?

Members of Genesis may remember that the Scheme launched an application to the High Court to have regulation 8 to the Medical Schemes Act (“the Act”) struck down.  Regulation 8 is the provision of the Act used by the Registrar of Medical Schemes to force medical schemes to pay any amount claimed by doctors for the treatment of health conditions listed as prescribed minimum benefits (“PMB”), in full.

Genesis is of the view that doctors are certainly entitled to a reasonable fee.  But should this fee be without limit?

What the Registrar thinks

During 2015 we told the story of an anaesthetist, Dr H, who attended to the removal of an appendix one afternoon.  The surgeon that actually removed the appendix (there was clearly no emergency) claimed R3 800, which amount was paid in full by Genesis.

Dr H (the anaesthetist), however, demanded to be paid the princely sum of R16 200 – more than four times the fee of the surgeon.  Genesis paid Dr H R8 927 – the limit set out in its rules for such a procedure.

Dr H demanded the balance of R7 273 and proceeded to lodge a complaint against Genesis with the Registrar.

The Registrar ruled against Genesis stating that because it was a PMB the Scheme must pay whatever amount is demanded by Dr H.

Genesis, of the firm view that the charge was egregious (remember the surgeon only charged R3 800) and in order to protect the Scheme’s members, lodged a complaint against Dr H with the Health Professions Council of SA (“HPCSA”).

The HPCSA ruled in favour of Dr H.  The reasoning was that because the patient consented to the doctor’s charges, he could charge whatever amount he liked.   More than likely what happened was that just before going off to theatre, Dr H presented himself to the patient to satisfy himself that the procedure would be uncomplicated (no allergies etc).  If asked about his charges, it was also likely that the doctor said not to worry it is a PMB and the medical aid must pay in full no matter what I charge.  And so he did.

The Registrar takes the view in that because the charge relates to treating a PMB, the Scheme (in other words, all its members) must pay whatever amount is demanded by the doctor even if it is a seemingly outrageous amount.

The sky is now the limit

Whilst we thought that the charges of Dr H were quite extraordinary, they were paled by what followed.  Just a few months ago, Genesis was faced with a claim from Dr D.  This doctor has set a new standard. His charge for a 23 minute procedure to stitch the eyebrow of his patient is in excess of R1 000 per MINUTE!!  This was not lifesaving surgery.

Yes, it was a PMB at 16h00 on a Wednesday afternoon, but at R60 000 an hour..?!

The Registrar will say that Genesis must pay in full.  The complaint to the HPCSA will likely come back with – well, the patient consented to the charges and so the doctor can charge what he likes (how can any ordinary member of the public know what things cost – he relies on his doctor to be reasonable).

So what is reasonable?

Do you think that R60 000 per hour, which equals R480 000 per day or R2 500 000 per week is a reasonable charge to stitch an eyebrow on a Wednesday afternoon?

You decide.

What we know is that the regulators are not going to offer any help or protection despite their statutory duty to protect you.  This sort of action by a group of doctors is precisely the reason why Genesis sought to remove regulation 8 from the Statute, because a regulation cannot override a section of the Act and the regulation is so badly drafted that it causes confusion.

On the basis that the Registrar of Medical Schemes endorses doctors charging whatever they like, it just cannot be long before every doctor charges R60 000 per hour.  It really is good money for the selected few that can get it, but this comes at the expense of every member who has to fund this through their contributions.

All of this is happening while everybody, including the Minister of Health, is bemoaning the high cost of healthcare.  Can anybody seriously wonder why this is when what we say above is happening with the blessing of the regulators?

As we said, you decide.

 
Source: Genesis Medical Scheme
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

South African Constitutional Court rethinking the “once-and-for-all rule”

By Kristen Wagner, Candidate Attorney and Deon Francis, Partner, Clyde & Co www. clydeco. com In the recent decision of MEC, Health and Social Development, Gauteng v DZ [2017] ZACC 37, the Constitutional ...
Read More »

  

MSD Announces Local Regulatory Approval of New Oncology Drug

Johannesburg, South Africa: MSD known as Merck & Co. , Inc. , (NYSE: MRK) in the United States and Canada, welcomes the regulatory approval of their new immuno-oncology drug, Pembrolizumab. In recognising the ...
Read More »

  

National Diabetes Month and World Diabetes day

Diabetes and depression can go hand in hand World diabetes day is celebrated annually around the world, on 14 November and Diabetes month during November. Dealing with the news that you have diabetes and have ...
Read More »

  

Novartis urges women to reduce their diabetes risk

Johannesburg: Ahead of World Diabetes Day on 14 November, Novartis South Africa has called on women to make themselves aware of diabetes risk factors and take steps to improve their health and that of their families ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Image

Short-term »

Advertise Here
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Balanced fund:

An investment company that invests in stocks and bonds. The same as a balanced mutual fund.
More Definitions »

 
 
By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2017.
All Rights Reserved.
Icon

Advertise

  Icon

eZine

  Icon

Contact IG

Icon

Media Pack

  Icon

RSS Feeds