Advertise Here


IconAccounting & Tax
IconAccreditation Bodies
IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconBusiness Process Management
IconBusiness Process Outsourcing
IconCompany Secretarial Services
IconCompare Medical Scheme Benefits
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDebit Order Collection Facilities
IconEducation and Training
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconExpatriate Cover
IconHealthcare Consultants
IconHuman Resources
IconInformation Technology and Software Partners
IconManaged Healthcare Service Providers
IconMedical Aid Administrators
IconMedical Aid Schemes
IconMedical Schemes Trustees Liability Insurance
IconMedical Service Providers
IconPolicy Administration
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconSurveys & Research
IconTraining Courses & Workshops
IconWellness Programs
  Subscribe To »

HFA concerned over ‘interim’ increases in medicine prices for 2018, seeks consultation






Lerato Mosiah, CEO
Health Funders Association (HFA)
The Health Funders Association (HFA) announces its strong opposition to any interim increase in medicine costs this year. Its announcement comes in the wake of recent media reports concerning lobbying of government by the pharmaceutical industry for a further increase in the 2018 single exit price adjustment for medicines.
Medicine prices are regulated. The single exit price (SEP) mechanism lists the maximum price that a medicine can be charged at, with dispensers able to charge a fixed dispensing fee depending on the price of the medicine. Lobbying efforts by industry were for a further increase over and above the 1.26% which was approved for the 2018 financial cycle and communicated in the Government Gazette No. 41362 of 29 December 2017, to compensate for rising inflation and the increase in the rate of VAT.
According to claims data from HFA member schemes, if an interim single exit price increase to the level of CPI were to be allowed, as proposed by the pharmaceutical industry, medical schemes would incur an additional cost of at least R260-million over the remaining four months of 2018 (considering projected volume growth). The annualised impact of this increase would be over R1-billion in 2019, even before next year’s single exit price adjustment. “Our considered view is that medical aid schemes and the South African healthcare consumer simply cannot afford to shoulder the burden of this additional medicine price increase during this current cycle,” says Lerato Mosiah, CEO of the HFA.
The HFA, which is committed to making private healthcare as accessible and affordable as possible for South Africans, argues that the inflation rate of medicine is already considerably higher than the negotiated single exit price adjustment. The general public may not understand or even be aware of this. 
“Based on data from our member organisations, medical schemes have experienced significant cost inflation during the first half of 2018, a trend which is expected to continue through the rest of 2018 and into 2019. Overall cost inflation of medicine is driven not only by the SEP adjustment but by volume growth as well, which compounds annual medicine price increases. Our data shows that, despite this year’s regulated SEP increase of 1.26%, during the first half of 2018 overall cost inflation for chronic medicines has increased by up to 6%, and up to 8% in the case of cancer medicines for some medical schemes,” says Mosiah.
This increase has been compounded by the VAT increase from 14% to 15% which was not factored into medical scheme budgets for 2018. The HFA estimates that this factor alone has imposed an additional R875-million unbudgeted expenditure on the medical aid industry in the current financial cycle. “Nonetheless, the vast majority of medical schemes opted to find ways to absorb this unbudgeted cost within their already stretched operating budgets, rather than seek to introduce interim contribution increases from members who are already under significant financial strain,” she says. 
Mosiah opposes the current practice where funders of medicines, as represented by HFA and Board of Healthcare Funders (BHF), are excluded from adding their input into the annual single exit price adjustment process. “Despite being the primary funders of pharmaceutical products in the private healthcare sector, medical schemes have consistently been excluded from input in the National Department of Health’s SEP adjustment process. This process also makes no provision for an assessment of the impact of any proposed SEP increase on medical schemes.”
The medical aid industry is acutely aware of the fact that the average South African is already under enormous financial pressure. The HFA argues it is absolutely critical that government’s response should have a strong bias towards protecting consumers, rather than to worsen their financial burden by allowing any interim increase for medicine prices as proposed by the pharmaceutical industry. “Our plea is that the National Department of Health should maintain the SEP increase as originally gazetted for the current cycle (March 2018 – February 2019), in the interest of healthcare consumers,” says Mosiah.
To this end, the HFA,  together with the BHF, as industry representative bodies for 54 medical schemes covering approximately 90% of medical scheme beneficiaries in South Africa, will be meeting with the National Department of Health’s Pricing Committee during the course of this week, to discuss any proposed interim single exit price adjustment for 2018; as well as any other related measures that could be introduced within the current regulatory framework, in order to increase access to affordable medicines in South Africa on a sustainable basis. 
“HFA hopes to persuade government not to take decisions that carry such significant negative impact on healthcare consumers, without first consulting with the medical scheme industry and assessing their anticipated financial impact and other related implications for medical schemes, their members and consumers in general.  
“While funders have been excluded from providing input in the past, the HFA is happy to have secured a meeting with the pricing committee to discuss this matter. We view this as an indication of a more stakeholder-inclusive approach from the committee, and are looking forward to a constructive conversation,” concludes Mosiah.    
Source: Cathy Findley Public Relations
« Back to previous page Print this page » |

Breaking News »

Coronavirus and its effects on international trade and insurance

The deadly novel coronavirus outbreak (2019-CoV) has resulted in passenger and cargo ships being quarantined around the world, partial and complete travel bans to parts of China and shipping and airlines being ...
Read More »


Negligent failure to perform caesarean section in time (UK)

The claimant, suing the UK National Health Service, had a medical history of having undergone two caesarean sections and a tear to her womb. Her fourth pregnancy was therefore regarded as “high risk” ...
Read More »


Euler Hermes Global Insolvency Index: Insolvencies expected to rise by 4% in South Africa

The upward trend in business insolvencies continued in 2019 for the third time in a row: +9% year on year, according to Euler Hermes Global Insolvency Index, which covers 44 countries that account for 87% of global ...
Read More »


Euthanasia 44 years later: a case of deja vu

The debate around euthanasia and its legal implications has stirred again due to the recent case of Professor Sean Davison, charged with three counts of murder in circumstances where the deceased’s had asked ...
Read More »


More News »


Investment »


Life »


Retirement »


Short-term »

Advertise Here

From The Glossary »


Fund Deficit:

The excess of the actuarial value of liabilities over the actuarial value of assets, based on the valuation method used.
More Definitions »






Contact IG


Media Pack


RSS Feeds

By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Insurance Gateway (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2020. All Rights Reserved.