Advertise Here
Icon

Directory

IconAccounting & Tax
IconAccreditation Bodies
IconActuaries
IconAssociations and Institutes
IconAuditors
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconBusiness Process Management
IconBusiness Process Outsourcing
IconCompany Secretarial Services
IconCompare Medical Scheme Benefits
IconCompliance
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDebit Order Collection Facilities
IconEducation and Training
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconExpatriate Cover
IconFAIS
IconHealthcare Consultants
IconHuman Resources
IconInformation Technology and Software Partners
IconLegal
IconManaged Healthcare Service Providers
IconMedical Aid Administrators
IconMedical Aid Schemes
IconMedical Schemes Trustees Liability Insurance
IconMedical Service Providers
IconOmbud
IconPolicy Administration
IconPublications
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconSurveys & Research
IconTraining Courses & Workshops
IconWellness Programs
Advertise Here
  Subscribe To »

Medical malpractice claims, adverse inferences and res ipsa loquitur

Published

2020

Sun

01

Nov

The Eastern Cape MEC for Health was held vicariously liable for the negligent conduct of provincial hospital nursing staff in failing to take the necessary steps to ensure that a patient’s wound was properly assessed and cleaned and that all debris, specifically a large shard of glass, had been removed. The patient’s wound became infected as a result and he suffered severe pain.

In subsequent treatment of the patient a 8cm by 3cm shard of glass was removed from the wound. Having regard to the dimensions of the shard of glass removed from the wound, and that the Department was unable to explain the omission in the hospital records confirming the nursing sister’s allegation that she had explored the wound, the probabilities and the circumstances compelled the inference that the wound was not explored as alleged.

The court referred to the Supreme Court of Appeal judgment of Goliath holding that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is not to be viewed as a presumption of law. Res ipsa loquitur means ‘the thing speaks for itself’ and is sometimes used to presume negligence in the absence of direct evidence of how the event happened. It is merely a permissible inference a court may draw if justified on consideration of all the facts.

A court must adopt a common sense approach in evaluating the evidence as a whole.

The burden of proof on the plaintiff never shifts. At the end of a trial, the court has to decide whether on the probabilities the defendant was negligent and that the negligence caused the plaintiff’s injury.

Determining negligence in medical negligence cases (as in all cases) should not be done in a piecemeal manner. In adjudicating causation the court must consider all the evidence placed before the court as a whole.

The res ipsa loquitur doctrine is merely a facet of the enquiry and cannot be construed to be the sole factor upon which a party’s case succeeds or fails.

The enquiry is always, having regard to all the evidence, has the plaintiff discharged the onus of proving, on the balance of probabilities, the negligence averred against the defendant.

In civil proceedings, however, it is not necessary for a plaintiff to prove that the inference asked to be drawn is the only reasonable inference. It is sufficient for the inference to be the most reasonably apparent and acceptable inference from a number of possible inferences.

The case is Saki v MEC for Health.

 

 
Source: Donald Dinnie - Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

Allianz Risk Barometer 2021: Covid-19 trio tops South Africa and global business risks

10th Allianz survey: Business interruption, Pandemic outbreak and Cyber incidents are the top three business risks for 2021 – all strongly interlinked. Cyber incidents, Business interruption and Pandemic ...
Read More »

  

Introducing our new eNews App

Insurance Gateway is thrilled to introduce our brand new electronic newspaper. The final product is available as both a mobile and desktop application. Our aim with the app was to develop an electronic newspaper ...
Read More »

  

Healthcare planning new year resolutions for 2021

2020 has been a brutal year, financially and emotionally. The pandemic and its subsequent aftershocks on household income and spending have been severe. Going into the new year, many families are reviewing household ...
Read More »

  

Healthcare Funding and Resources – SA’s ‘other’ pandemic

Wednesday, 9 December 2020 - The global COVID-19 pandemic has plunged the medical community into a furious race to develop a vaccine – at an exponentially faster rate than any other illnesses. By early June ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Image

Short-term »

Advertise Here
Image
Image
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Buy-and-Sell Agreement:

A buy-and-sell agreement is an agreement between the members of a business entity, obligating themselves to sell on their deaths (or disability) their interest to the survivors and likewise obligating the surviviors to purchased the deceased member`s interest.
More Definitions »

 

Advertise

 

eZine

 

Contact IG

 

Media Pack

 

RSS Feeds

By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Insurance Gateway (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2021. All Rights Reserved.