Image
Icon

Directory

IconAlternative Investments
IconAsset Managers
IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconFinancial Planners
IconInvestment Consulting
IconLinked Investment Service Providers
IconListed Equities
IconOmbud
IconOnline Share Trading
IconParticipation Bond Managers
IconProperty Unit Trusts
IconPublications
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconStock Exchange
IconUnit Trust Fund Managers
IconWellness Programs
Advertise Here
  Subscribe To »

PRESCRIBED ASSETS – THE BAD, NOT SO BAD AND THE GREAT

Published

2019

Wed

26

Jun

The ANC’s 2019 manifesto refers to investigating prescribed assets, which are defined as the proportion of financial institutions’ resources that would be assigned to socially productive assets as a key priority.

Janina Slawski, principal investment consultant at Alexander Forbes Investments, explains that prescribed assets are mentioned under the two sections in the 2019 manifesto. She stresses that both mentions refer to investigation and that no detail has been provided about the form that the prescription could take. “The references to investments in ‘social and economic development’, ‘socially productive investments’ and ‘job creation’ are encouraging, but there is concern that this could be applied to mean investment in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and municipalities that have social and economic development as part of their mandates, for example Eskom, Transnet, Sanral and so on.”

Slawski explains that prescription suggests that investors invest in specified assets, which will generally lead to sub-optimal investment outcomes. However, “positive incentives and structures generally lead to positive investment outcomes for both investors and communities,” Slawski adds.

Prescribed assets were first introduced in South Africa in 1956, when pension funds were required to invest more than half of their assets into government and SOE bonds. The Prudential Investment Guidelines (PIGs) required that 53% of retirement fund assets, 33% of assets of long-term insurance companies and 75% of the Public Investment Commissioners’ (now Public Investment Corporation (PIC)) managed assets be invested into government and SOE bonds. The Jacobs Committee of 1988 was appointed to investigate prescribed assets and the distortions introduced by this prescription; the committee recommended that the policy be abolished. Although prescribed assets in this format were abolished in the National Budget of 1989, Slawski adds “prescription for maximums per asset classes and exposures continue in terms of Regulation 28”.

“The introduction of prescription and the potential reduction in investment returns would leave members poorer, contrary to the positive changes achieved to date through the retirement reform initiatives,” says Slawski. “It would be introduced in a period of expected low returns, when it is critical that all focus should be on maximising returns.”

“Trustees of retirement funds have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of members and prescribed assets will limit the extent to which trustees can fulfil these duties,” explains Slawski.

She continues, “Prescribed assets would go against the intention of prevailing legislation and the requirements of trustees.”

The enforced nature of the investment is problematic, as investors do not have the opportunity to negotiate better terms for the investment or to walk away from unfavourable terms.

Slawski stresses that investment into appropriate developmental assets is critical to ignite social and economic development and job creation.

She notes that attractive developmental investment opportunities will attract investments with no prescription required. “If a process were to be formally initiated for prescribed assets, there should be extensive consultation before the requirements for prescribed assets could be implemented in terms of the law.”

“Alexander Forbes is opposed to any regulation, including prescription, that could lead to sub-optimal investment outcomes for investors, in particular members of retirement funds where fiduciary duty requires that members’ benefits be safeguarded and grown,” she concludes.

 

 
Source: Alexander Forbes Investments
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

OLD MUTUAL LAUNCHES HANDPICKED RANGE OF PRODUCTS TO SUIT SPECIFIC INVESTMENT GOALS

According to the 2019 Old Mutual Savings and Retirement Monitor, less than 30% of people are saving for emergencies and more than 42% are not making contributions to formal retirement savings. Coupled with this, ...
Read More »

  

What SA investors can learn from the case of Greek government bonds

Justin Floor, PSG Asset Management   Ten-year Greek government bonds – deemed ‘uninvestable’ at the height of the eurozone crisis – are currently yielding 2. What makes this ...
Read More »

  

Introducing Our New Website!

The Insurance Gateway® team is excited to share our new website with you. Given our strategic objectives for 2019 and the fact that our last website redesign was over five years ago, we decided on a much anticipated ...
Read More »

  

Exciting prospects in both equities and bonds, despite negative sentiment

A prolonged period of poor performance from the local equity market has left many investors anxious and frustrated. While most understand the importance of taking a long-term view, it’s usually more difficult ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Healthcare »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Image

Short-term »

Advertise Here
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Quartile:

A range in which a quarter (25%) of any set of statistics lie.
More Definitions »

 

Advertise

 

eZine

 

Contact IG

 

Media Pack

 

RSS Feeds

By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Insurance Gateway (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2019. All Rights Reserved.