Advertise Here


IconAdministration Outsourcing
IconAsset Managers
IconAssociations & Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconBusiness Chambers
IconBusiness Process Management
IconBusiness Process Outsourcing
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDebit Order Collection Facilities
IconEducation and Training
IconHuman Resources
IconInformation Technology and Software Partners
IconInvestment Consulting
IconInvestment Fund Managers
IconListed Equities
IconParticipation Bond Managers
IconPolicy Administration
IconPolicy Trading
IconProperty Unit Trusts (PUTS)
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconStock Exchange
IconSurveys and Research
IconTraining Courses & Workshops
IconUnit Trust Fund Managers
IconWellness Programs
  Subscribe To »

Why the rise in passive investing may benefit active managers






Proponents of passive investing advocate low-cost returns, guaranteed to closely match those of the market. In contrast, many active managers globally have had a tough time achieving index returns. Will the next five years be any different?
Passive investing has seen a meteoric rise over the past decade, with passive products in the US – the world’s largest passive market – now receiving substantial inflows, while their actively managed counterparts are experiencing outflows (cumulative flows are shown in Graph 1).
Graph 1: Overall cumulative flows into US active and passive funds ($ trillion)*
*As at May 2018. Passive funds include exchange-traded funds.
Sources: ICI; J.P. Morgan
However, the surge in passive strategies has resulted in market distortions.
By its nature, most passive investing is not price sensitive. “We believe that this has contributed to popular, expensive stocks leading the pack in recent years – and in turn, to the tough environment price-sensitive managers have faced,” says Greg Hopkins, Chief Investment Officer of PSG Asset Management.
Market areas that are dominated by passive products are also susceptible to large and sudden in- and outflows, which have the potential to create significant price distortions. Emerging markets are a case in point, and experienced significant outflows in May and June this year as passive portfolios down-weighted exposures on the back of poor emerging market sentiment.
Could the pendulum have swung too far?
Fidelity launched the world’s first zero-fee index funds earlier this month; a move that lends further weight to the case for passive investing and which could spur competitors to follow suit.
“While investors seeking passive products stand to benefit, we would caution – as we always do – that when sentiment or expectations shift too far, there is the risk that results could fall short. Conversely, pervasive negativity often proves to be unfounded,” Hopkins says.
The past five years have not been supportive of price-sensitive active managers, as passive flows have been driving most prices higher. However, Hopkins says that passive market distortions can create opportunities for active managers. “If we look to the next five years, we’re quite positive on the opportunities astute active investors are likely to be presented,” he says.
“We believe that the market distortions passive investing causes create fertile ground for active managers to capitalise on mispricing. Sustained inflows into popular market areas tend to drive the prices of expensive assets higher, while broad shifts in sentiment can result in abrupt and significant outflows that push prices down. This creates opportunities for active managers to sell high and buy low.”
In addition, Hopkins says that in the current environment, passive strategies may pose risks.
“While we believe that passive investments have their place, we would caution that an indiscriminate passive strategy currently carries significant risk, as the bulk of passive capital is being allocated to expensive stocks.”
This is especially true for US-focused passive products, as the US market is currently the most popular (and one of the most expensive) globally, while also being the strongest passive foothold.
“We see far more attractive opportunities in the stocks that are being left behind, and in uncrowded market areas that haven’t enjoyed the benefit of considerable passive flows.”
Given the pronounced impact passive investing has had, Hopkins believes that opportunities for active managers on both a regional and stock-specific basis are improving. But to generate the alpha the market’s so long been waiting for, an active strategy must be sufficiently differentiated from the passive alternative.
“We believe that if we stick to choosing wisely from uncrowded and unloved parts of the markets, our clients will continue to be rewarded with benchmark-beating returns over the long run.”   
Source: Claire Densham Communications
« Back to previous page Print this page » |

Breaking News »

The Imminent Reality of Cyberattacks for Business

No longer an if, but when a business will experience a cyber attack Participants in Aon's 2019 Global Risk Management Survey ranked cyberattacks and data breaches as #6 in the top 10 risks facing organisations ...
Read More »



CGF is delighted to welcome Travers Cape as a Lead Independent Consultant to our company. Travers has acquired a wealth of experience in senior financial management positions and fulfilled various strategic ...
Read More »


Solving the retirement savings challenge

Lessons from around the world   Around the world, workers are being compelled to take more responsibility for their retirement savings as many employers move from traditional Defined Benefit (DB) ...
Read More »


Asia Corporate Payment Survey 2019: Deteriorating payment trends amid trade war woes

Coface’s 2019 Asia Corporate Payment Survey covered over 3,000 companies in nine economies (Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and Taiwan). 63% of companies surveyed ...
Read More »


More News »


Healthcare »


Life »


Retirement »


Short-term »

Advertise Here

Have Your Say »

Is insurance a priority for South African millennial's

|Results »
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »


Adverse Selection:

The tendency for poorer risks (less-desirable insureds) to seek insurance, to continue insurance, or to select options of settlement that are favourable to them, to a greater extent than do good risks (more desirable insureds). See anti-selection and selection against.
More Definitions »






Contact IG


Media Pack


RSS Feeds

By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Insurance Gateway (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2019. All Rights Reserved.