Image
Icon

Directory

IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconBenefit Administrators & Investment Managers
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconEmployee Benefits Consultants
IconFinancial Planners
IconIndependent Principal Officer
IconIndependent Trustees
IconOmbud
IconPension Fund Adjudicator
IconPension Fund Trustee Liability Insurance
IconPension Fund Trustee Training
IconPublications
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconRetirement Advice
IconRetirement Funds registered by the FSB
IconRetirement Products
IconSocial Grants (Government)
IconTrust Establishment & Management
IconWellness Programs
Image
  Subscribe To »

Aftermath of Marikana – Union Rivalry extends to Pension Funds

Published

2017

Mon

26

Jun

Company Listing: Today's Trustee »
 

Mineworkers’ savings get shot in Bophelo while the battle between Amcu and NUM flares in retirement funds

 

 

 

 

Allan Greenblo, Editorial Director
Today’s Trustee

 

 

All hell has broken loose on the North West platinum belt in the rivalry between the Association of Mineworkers & Construction Union, formed after the Marikana tragedy in August 2012, and the National Union of Mineworkers, displaced from its majority status on mines in the Rustenburg area.

It’s ominous that their rivalry now extends to the pension-fund space. That Amcu has set out to form its own retirement fund, in opposition to the Mineworkers Provident Fund traditionally comprising mainly NUM members, is the tip of an iceberg.

Below this tip, in danger territory, lie the mines’ participating employers in the funds long established for their employees: Anglo Platinum in the Amplats Group Provident Fund (Sibanye being admitted as principal employer from November, having bought certain Anglo Platinum mines) and Impala Platinum in the Implats Workers Provident Fund.

The Financial Services Board is also involved: first, through legal challenges respectively brought by both the Amplats and Implats funds concerning trustees; second, by the debacle at Mvunonala subsidiary Bophelo Benefit Services. It had failed to pay, from monies entrusted to it, mineworkers’ child dependents on them reaching adulthood.

Matters are being unceremoniously brought to a head. It was reported in March by City Press that Bophelo had lost R255m, and possibly as much as R560m, of money belonging to mineworkers in the Amplats fund. At much the same time, seven Implats fund trustees (said to be Amcu members) were arrested for allegedly having attempted to extort bribes from funeral-schemes operator Arian Solutions Group.

Two points are worth noting because they might become relevant as these matters progress. One is the Public Investment Corporation’s 30% ownership of Bophelo Insurance Group. The PIC’s significant stake would have offered comfort to Bophelo clients. The other is that nothing by the name of Arian or similar emerges from a search of FSB records. The FSB confirms that Arian Solutions Group is not a registered provider of financial services.

That said, the FSB deserves to feel uncomfortable. In order to avert another Fidentia disaster and for the protection funds’ beneficiaries, Pensions Registrar Dube Tshidi had been instrumental in the launch of beneficiary funds under FSB supervision. Yet again there’s something that smacks of Fidentia.

Further, in May the Registrar appointed a statutory manager to Bophelo Benefit Services and the Bophelo Beneficiary Fund. Making the announcement, the FSB said that last July it had “conducted a routine on-site visit on BBS and made certain findings in a preliminary report”. So there doesn’t appear to have been much preemptive action to avert what was destined to happen.

Then there’s the litigation.

In November the High Court in Johannesburg granted Anglo Platinum, the principal employer of the Amplats fund, an urgent order declaring that Salt Employee Benefits had not been appointed as administrator of the Amplats fund and that Devadasen Somiah had not been appointed as the fund’s principal officer.

Anglo Platinum finance director Ian Botha stated on affidavit that there’d been “considerable dissent” between trustees of the Amplats fund, endangering the fund’s “very existence”. The most important areas of dissent were the status of Salt, purportedly appointed by trustees as the fund’s new administrator, and of Somiah, purportedly appointed as the fund’s new principal officer.

Without finality to the disputes, Davis warned, there’d be “extremely dire consequences for the (Amplats fund) and for the many thousands of its members who are overwhelmingly (Anglo Platinum) employees”. The fund’s board had expeditiously to consider the offer by Sanlam for continuation of its administration services (i.e. not to be replaced by Salt) and to find a new principal officer on whom fund trustees could agree.

With the declaratory granted, normality is restored at Amplats. At least for now.

On the Implats fund, board abnormalities aren’t dissimilar. There’ll possibly soon be an appeal against the Registrar’s appointment of particular trustees. He’d effectively removed from office the trustees that the employer, Impala Platinum, had appointed. This was allegedly without the employer’s approval.

Such are the power struggles. As they wage, the supremacy of fund members’ best interests daren’t be the loser.

 
Source: Today’s Trustee
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

What power do women have over finances?

Cape Town: On average women tend to outlive men by up to seven to ten years, according to the World Health Organisation (WHO); additionally, they have longer breaks away from work due to maternity leave and generally ...
Read More »

  

Fairness in Justice

In a recent decision concerning a Sharemax investment, the FSB Appeal Board said that section 20(3) of the FAIS Act requires the FAIS Ombud to consider complaints in a procedurally fair, informal, economical and ...
Read More »

  

Unclaimed retirement fund benefit search engine has been implemented

By the Financial Services Board   1. Unclaimed retirement benefit search process An enquirer will be provided with a unique reference number for each enquiry logged ...
Read More »

  

Investment Charges… Fee, fi, fo

In the contested umbrella-fund industry, cost comparisons really shouldn’t be complex for readers of product providers’ marketing material       Allan Greenblo, Editorial ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Healthcare »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Short-term »

Advertise Here
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Evidence Of Insurability:

Personal information presented by an applicant for life insurance to the life insurance company from which the company determines the acceptability of the life to be insured and any premium loading or special conditions in the event that the proposed life to be insured is ‘substandard’. Evidence of insurability usually consists of statements by the life to be insured in the proposal, a medical examination, or non-medical data submitted in lieu ...
More Definitions »

 
 
By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2017.
All Rights Reserved.
Icon

Advertise

  Icon

eZine

  Icon

Contact IG

Icon

Media Pack

  Icon

RSS Feeds