IconAppraisers and Valuers
IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDefensive Driver Training
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconForensic Investigation Services
IconInsurance Brokers - Alphabetical Listing
IconInsurance Brokers by Type of Product or Service Needed
IconInsurance Companies
IconInsurance Consultants
IconLightning Damage & Surge Protection Specialists
IconOnline Quotes and Cover
IconPremium Financing
IconPublic Loss Adjustors
IconRating Agencies
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconRisk Finance
IconRisk Management
IconRisk Surveyors
IconSalvage Operators
IconTelephone Quotes
IconVehicle Accident Management
IconVehicle and Household Risk Inspection Services
IconVehicle Tracking
IconWellness Programs
  Subscribe To »

Setting aside arbitrator’s award for going beyond the dispute







Patrick Bracher, Director
Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.

Arbitration clauses must be construed liberally to give effect to their essential purpose which is to resolve legal disputes arising from commercial relationships before privately agreed tribunals, instead of through the courts.

When business people choose to arbitrate their disputes they generally intend that all their disputes will be determined by the same tribunal unless they express the wish to exclude any issues from the arbitrator’s jurisdiction in clear language.

There is a presumption in favour of one-stop arbitration.

One of the arbitrating parties in Riversdale Mining Ltd v Du Plessis claimed that the arbitrator who was supposed to deal with ‘existing disputes’ had dealt with an issue that was not an existing dispute at the time of agreeing to the arbitration. The decision complained of related to the impact of one clause of a share subscription agreement on another clause.

It was held to be unbusinesslike and insensible to construe the arbitration agreement in a manner that gave the arbitrator the power to resolve all disputes concerning the validity and enforceability of the agreement but to exclude a dispute regarding the interpretation of the contract. The arbitrator had therefore not committed any irregularity.

When embarking on arbitration, the dispute should be declared and defined as clearly as possible to avoid cases like this. If an arbitrator commits an error of law it is not reviewable by the courts.

Source: Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.
« Back to previous page Print this page » |

Breaking News »

Zimbabwe: So Long Robert Mugabe

By Coface, the international trade credit insurance company     On November 21st, after 37 years as Zimbabwe strongman Robert Mugabe, 93 years old, resigned from the presidency. Mr Mugabe’s ...
Read More »


Top three reasons why your commercial claim may get rejected

      Jurgen Hellweg, CEO Western National Insurance           As a business owner, there are so many aspects to consider and understand ...
Read More »


Protect your loved ones from accidents and injuries this holiday

The Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC)’s statistics for the period January to December 2016 showed a 9% year on year increase in road accident related deaths, totalling 14071. As many South African ...
Read More »


Germany: Going From “Jamaica” to Spain?

By Coface, the international trade credit insurance company   After about four weeks of intensive talks, the formation of a so called “Jamaica” coalition failed in Germany. The Liberal ...
Read More »


More News »


Healthcare »


Investment »


Life »


Retirement »

Advertise Here

From The Glossary »


Discretionary Trust:

This is a trust created in your will in which the Trustees are empowered to provide in their own discretion for the needs of the heirs concerned.
More Definitions »

By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2017.
All Rights Reserved.





Contact IG


Media Pack


RSS Feeds