Image
Icon

Directory

IconAppraisers and Valuers
IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDefensive Driver Training
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconForensic Investigation Services
IconInsurance Brokers - Alphabetical Listing
IconInsurance Brokers by Type of Product or Service Needed
IconInsurance Companies
IconInsurance Consultants
IconLightning Damage & Surge Protection Specialists
IconOmbud
IconOnline Quotes and Cover
IconPremium Financing
IconPublic Loss Adjustors
IconPublications
IconRating Agencies
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconRisk Finance
IconRisk Management
IconRisk Surveyors
IconSalvage Operators
IconTelephone Quotes
IconVehicle Accident Management
IconVehicle and Household Risk Inspection Services
IconVehicle Tracking
IconWellness Programs
Image
  Subscribe To »

Cyberattack by telephone held not to be computer fraud (US)

Published

2017

Wed

29

Mar

 

 

 

 

 

Patrick Bracher, Director
Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.

 

 

Where an insurer’s policy covered computer fraud, a Georgia US judge refused to grant the insured an indemnity when the fraud had been committed over the phone.

The insured provides a service that allows customers to load funds onto debit cards issued by third party banks and sold by retailers. The amount on the card can be redeemed by telephoning the insured which then transfers the funds to the issuing bank for the cardholder to draw on.

A coding error allowed cardholders to redeem the cards more than once and the insured lost more than $11.4 million in unauthorised charges. The court held that the policy did not cover the losses incurred from unauthorised redemption of the debit cards because the redemptions made over the phone were not made by computer even though the transactions were processed by computer at the insured’s end.

That a computer was somehow involved in the loss did not establish that the wrongdoers ‘used’ a computer to cause the loss as required by the policy.

[The case is InComm Holdings Inc. v Great American Insurance Co. case number 1:15-cv-2671 US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia]

 
Source: Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

It's holiday time – make sure your insurance details are up to date

As our thoughts turn to the coming holiday season, it's a good time to make sure that all your insurance details are up to date, especially if you are planning to go away. The last thing you want is to return ...
Read More »

  

Limited right to challenge arbitrator’s decision (UK)

    Patrick Bracher, Director Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.     The losing party before an arbitration tribunal cannot challenge the decision of the ...
Read More »

  

Chile: The Next President Will Inherit a Bottoming Out Economy

By Coface, the international trade credit insurance company   On the 19th November, Chile will hold presidential elections. Immediate re-election is forbidden in the country, leaving President Michelle ...
Read More »

  

Hope amidst the ashes: Knysna Fire Stories

Book featuring local photography and heroic stories to raise funds for local fire relief efforts     South Africa: Residents of Knysna have united to compile and publish a coffee table book, ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Healthcare »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Property:

Property can also refer to anything that can be owned, but in investment terms it means land or buildings - what the Americans call "real estate".
More Definitions »

 
 
By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2017.
All Rights Reserved.
Icon

Advertise

  Icon

eZine

  Icon

Contact IG

Icon

Media Pack

  Icon

RSS Feeds