Icon

Directory

IconAccounting & Tax
IconActuaries
IconAdministrators
IconAppraisers & Valuers
IconArbitration Services
IconASIB
IconAssessors & Loss Adjusters
IconAssist and Lifestyle Benefits
IconAssociations & Institutes
IconAuditors
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconBroker Acquisition Financing
IconBrokers for Brokers
IconBusiness Process Management
IconBusiness Process Outsourcing
IconCall Centre Outsourcing & Sales
IconCompany Secretarial Services
IconCompliance
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDebit Order Collection Facilities
IconDefensive Driver Training
IconEducation and Training
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconFAIS
IconFire, Storm, Flood Damage Specialists
IconForensic Investigation Services
IconHuman Resources
IconIndustrial Cleaners
IconInformation Technology and Software Partners
IconInsurance Companies
IconLegal
IconLightning Damage & Surge Protection Specialists
IconNiche Insurance Products
IconOmbud
IconOutbound Sales
IconOutsourcing Companies
IconPolicy Administration
IconPremium Financing
IconPublic Loss Adjustors
IconPublications
IconRating Agencies
IconReference Books & Material
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconRisk Finance
IconRisk Management
IconRisk Surveyors
IconSalvage Operators
IconSpecialized Claims Investigations & Assessing
IconSurveys and Research
IconTraining Courses & Workshops
IconUnderwriting Managers
IconVehicle Accident Management
IconVehicle and Household Risk Inspection Services
IconVehicle Tracking
IconWellness Programs
IconWholesale Brokers
IconZZZZZZ
Image
  Subscribe To »

Damage arising from marijuana operations not covered by policy (US)

Published

2018

Mon

03

Sep

 

 

 

Sandra Sithole, Director
Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.
 

 

 

A US appeals court in August 2018 found that an insurer does not have to indemnify its insured for damage to a warehouse by tenants who converted it into a marijuana growing operation, finding that an exclusion in the policy for losses resulting from criminal acts precluded cover.

The claim arose under the building and personal property coverage section of a standard first-party commercial insurance contract in which the insurer agreed to pay for ‘direct physical loss of or damage to General Property… caused by or resulting from any covered Cause of Loss’.

The policy contained an exclusion that the insurer ‘will not pay for loss or damage caused by or resulting from’ any ‘dishonest or criminal act by you …or anyone to whom you entrust the property for any purpose’. 

The insured, a commercial landlord, leased several units of property to a group of commercial tenants for general office or light industrial business. During 2015, the US Drug Enforcement Agency raided the premises and caught the tenants growing lots of marijuana. The insured immediately evicted the tenants but to accommodate their ‘business’ the tenants had removed walls, cut holes in the roof, altered ductwork and severely damaged the HVAC systems, the repair costs of which were significant.

The insured argued that this was clearly an act of vandalism which was covered by the policy.

The court found that while the insuring clause covered the loss, the ‘criminal acts’ exclusion negated coverage.

The court also rejected the insured’s contention that because no convictions were made, the exclusion for criminal acts can apply only if the wrongdoing results in a conviction. The court said that the insurer’s policy referred to ‘criminal acts’ not ‘crime’ or a ‘criminal conviction’. Requiring a conviction would be too onerous on the insurer in circumstances where the policy imposed no such requirement.

The case is KVG Properties Inc. v Westfield Insurance Co.  

 
Source: Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc.
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

Fast-changing Arctic and North Atlantic conditions bring route risks

Climate change is impacting ice hazards for shipping, freeing up new trade routes in some areas, while increasing the risk of ice in others.   There was another milestone for Arctic shipping ...
Read More »

  

Associated Compliance Newsletter 068 – August 2018

The August 2018 Associated Compliance Newsletter has been published in the Insurance Gateway® Knowledge Base. The compliance landscape has become increasingly time consuming and complex to navigate. It will ...
Read More »

  

SAIA Consumer Education initiative recognised as ‘best practice’

Johannesburg: In its latest infographic on “The importance of financial education in promoting financial inclusion”, the Belgium based Global Federation of Insurance Associations (GFIA) commended the ...
Read More »

  

Importance of RE Qualifying Criteria

In response to a recent enquiry from a candidate, it is important to highlight the absolute necessity to ensure that you take into account the qualifying criteria when preparing for the regulatory exams. Firstly, ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Healthcare »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Stop Loss Reinsurance:

A specialised form of excess of loss reinsurance, usually applicable to certain lines of insurance showing wide loss variation. For example, hail insurance, where four good years might be followed by a calamitous one. Stop loss reinsurance differs materially from the usual excess of loss treaty as the reinsurer is not responsible for the amount by which any individual claim exceeds a fixed sum, but instead indemnifies the ceding company in respect ...
More Definitions »

 
 
By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2018.
All Rights Reserved.
Icon

Advertise

  Icon

eZine

  Icon

Contact IG

Icon

Media Pack

  Icon

RSS Feeds